We have to admit being taken by surprise by Moon's rejection of Gulf War II, and what appears to be a sudden drop in the Times's support for Bush.
On the one hand, the Washington Times has spent months painting a red smear on war protesters, Richard Nixon style, as well as dealing in hatred of France.
On the other hand, their support for Bush seems to have sharply dropped in recent weeks. It seemed to have started with the Times's revelation that Bush had sought support from the professor arrested in Florida for alleged Hamas ties. Now, the paper asks: "Will Bush be impeached? Will he be called a war criminal?"
Did Moon not get something he was promised? What's going on behind the scenes?